Which is NOT a strategy for defusing potentially harmful situations?

One latest institution question and answer requested students to indicate what they think is the main important thing for a student to do in order to accomplish success. Of the numerous results, the one which that stood out was practice. People who are definitely successful do not become successful by being born. They work hard and commitment their lives to succeeding. This is how you can reach your goals. These are some question and answer examples that you might possibly utilise to upgrade your knowledge and gain insight that will guide you to preserve your school studies.


Which is NOT a strategy for defusing potentially harmful situations?a) Distract
b) Direct
c) Deactivate
d) Delegate


Deactivate is not a strategy for defusing potentially harmful situations.

Each of the three options in the questions are used in situations where there are arguments that could lead to harmful situations

Distract: In a situation whereby there are arguments between two persons, a third person could use the distraction method to get them to pause. spilling a cup of tea is an action that could be distracting.

Direct: This means confronting the existing problem head on. In other to do this the third person may have to pull one of the arguing parties away in other to stop issues from escalating.

The delegate method is used by getting another person to intervene on the issues at hand

From the answer and question examples above, hopefully, they can possibly help the student answer the question they had been looking for and remember of everything declared in the answer above. Then can potentially make some sharing in a group discussion and also study with the classmate with regards to the topic, so another student also possess some enlightenment and still keeps up the school learning.

READ MORE  Which type of evidence would support the author's claim?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.