Read Justice John Paul Stevens’s dissenting opinion in the Citizens United case.

Students were asked to answer a question at schools and to claim what is most important for them to succeed. One which response stood out from the rest was practice. Successful people are certainly born successful; they become successful with hard work and persistence. If you tend to complete your goals, keep this in mind! as follows some question and answer examples that you could possibly utilize to further enhance your knowledge and gain insight that will guide you to keep up your school studies.

Question:

Read Justice John Paul Stevens’s dissenting opinion in the Citizens United case.

At bottom, the Court’s opinion is thus a rejection of the common sense of the American people, who have recognized a need to prevent corporations from undermining self government since the founding, and who have fought against the distinctive corrupting potential of corporate electioneering since the days of Theodore Roosevelt. –Justice Stevens Dissenting Opinion Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission
What does Justice Stevens say about the Court’s ruling?
A. Corporate money will make elections more likely to reflect the public will.
B. Corporate money will have no influence on elections.
C. Corporate money has changed since the days of Theodore Roosevelt.
D. Corporate money will make elections less likely to reflect the public will.

Answer:

Justice Stevens did say about the Court’s ruling  that Corporate money will make elections less likely to reflect the public will.

What was the dissenting opinion in Citizens United v FEC?

Associate Justice John Paul Stevens  was said to have declared that the court’s ruling stands as a kind of “a rejection of the common sense of the American citizen, who have seen a need to hinder corporations from looking low at self government.”

READ MORE  Which of the following describes a rigid motion transformation? A. Hitting a tennis ball over a net B. Enlarging the size of a parking spot C. Slicing a sandwich into 4 pieces D. Dilating a picture

The Court was said to have ruled, in5-4, that the First Amendment hinders or place a limits on corporate funding of independent broadcasts in terms of candidate election.

Learn more about  Court’s ruling from

They may hopefully guide the student solve the question by implementing the questions and answer examples. Then could possibly have some sharing in a group discussion and also learning with the classmate in reference to the topic, so another student also own some enlightenment and still keeps up the school learning.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.